Comparable long­term survival outcomes of endoscopic treatment versus surgical treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumors with a diameter of 5-10 cm.

Currently, endoscopic treatment for small gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) has been widely accepted. However, for tumors larger than 5 cm, endoscopic treatment has not been recognized by national guidelines as the standard therapy due to concerns about safety and adverse tumor outcomes. Therefore, this study compares the long-term survival outcomes of endoscopic treatment and surgical treatment for GIST in the range of 5-10 cm. We selected patients with GIST from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2015. Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test were employed to compare the long-term survival outcomes between endoscopic treatment and surgical treatment. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used for analysis to identify risk factors influencing patient prognosis. To balance baseline data, we performed 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). A total of 1223 GIST patients were included, with 144 patients (11.8%) received endoscopic treatment and 1079 patients (88.2%) received surgical treatment. Before PSM, there was no significant difference in the long-term survival rates between the two groups [5-year OS (86.5% vs. 83.5%, P = 0.42), 10-year OS (70.4% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.42)]. After adjusting for covariates, we found that the overall survival (HR = 1.26, 95% CI 0.89-1.77, P = 0.19) and cancer-specific survival (HR = 1.69, 95% CI 0.99-2.89, P = 0.053) risks were comparable between the endoscopic treatment group and the surgical treatment group. In the analysis after PSM, there was no significant difference between the endoscopic treatment group and the surgical treatment group. Our study found that for GIST patients with tumor sizes between 5 and 10 cm, the long-term OS and CSS outcomes were similar between the endoscopic treatment group and the surgical treatment group.

Metastasis patterns and prognosis in young gastric cancer patients: A propensity score­matched SEER database analysis.

BACKGROUND: Whether young patients with metastatic gastric cancer (GC) had distinct metastasis patterns and survival outcomes from older patients remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to explore the metastasis patterns and prognostic factors in young patients and evaluate the survival outcome in comparison to their older counterparts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified patients with metastatic GC in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2015. The patients were divided into two groups based on age at diagnosis: younger (≤40 years old) and older (>40 years old). We employed the chi-squared test to compare the clinicopathological characteristics between the two age groups. Furthermore, we conducted survival analyses using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. To balance disparities in baseline characteristics, we employed propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: We identified 5,580 metastatic GC patients from the SEER database, with 237 (4.2%) classified as younger and 5343 (95.8%) as older patients. A total of 237 pairs of patients were generated after adjustment by PSM. Patients in the younger group exhibited a higher proportion of bone-only metastases and a lower proportion of liver-only metastases compared with patients in the older group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that youth was an independent protective factor for overall survival (OS) before and after PSM, but not for gastric cancer-specific survival (GCSS). Among the younger group, patients with liver-only metastasis demonstrated the best prognosis, whereas patients with lung-only metastasis exhibited significantly worse survival outcomes compared with liver-only metastases, even comparable to that of bone metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the older group, the metastatic GC patients in the younger group exhibited more aggressive tumors but better prognoses. The metastasis pattern and its effect on the prognosis of GC varied by age group.

[Fonction de l'ARNnc exosomal HEIH dans le carcinome hépatocellulaire associé au virus de l'hépatite B]. / Function of exosomal lncRNA-HEIH in hepatocellular carcinoma associated with hepatitis B virus.

Long non-coding RNA-HEIH (lncRNA-HEIH) is a potential biomarker for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but exosomal lncRNA-HEIH in patients with hepatitis B virus-associated HCC (B-HCC) is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the expression of exosomal lncRNA-HEIH in B-HCC patients and explore its clinical significance. We collected blood samples from 60 B-HCC patients, 60 non-hepatitis virus-associated HCC (N-HCC) patients, and 50 healthy volunteers. Exosomal lncRNA-HEIH levels were measured by real-time PCR and analyzed for their correlation with patient prognosis using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Multivariate COX regression analysis was conducted to identify factors affecting patient outcomes. The effects of lncRNA-HEIH on carcinogenesis were also investigated by constructing a Huh7 cell line stably expressing the hepatitis B virus. In the B-HCC group, there was a positive correlation between hepatitis B virus and exosomal lncRNA-HEIH. The 5-year survival rate of the exosomal lncRNA-HEIH high-expression group was significantly lower than that of the low-expression group in the B-HCC group, but not in the N-HCC group. Exosomal lncRNA-HEIH level was related to the TNM stage, lymph node metastasis and AFP. Exosomal lncRNA-HEIH level was independent risk factors for poor prognosis in B-HCC patients. In Huh7-HBV cells, lncRNA-HEIH level was significantly higher than in control, and the migration capacity of Huh7-HBV cells decreased significantly after down-regulating lncRNA-HEIH. Our findings suggest that exosomal lncRNA-HEIH is abnormally expressed and closely related to poor prognosis in B-HCC patients, indicating its potential as a diagnostic and therapeutic target for HBV-associated HCC.

Impact of grade on workup of rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a retrospective cohort study : Grade impact on workup of rectal NETs.

BACKGROUND: Rectal neuroendocrine tumors (RNETs) are often discovered on screening colonoscopy. Indications for staging and definitive resection are inconsistent in current guidelines. We evaluated the role of grade in guiding staging and procedural decision-making. METHODS: Patients with biopsy confirmed RNETs between 2004 and 2015 were reviewed. Baseline characteristics, staging investigations (biochemical and imaging), and endoscopic/surgical treatment were recorded. Associations between grade, preoperative staging, interventions, and survival were determined using Fisher-Freeman-Halton Exact, log-rank, and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Amongst 139 patients with RNETs, 9% were aged ≥ 75 years and 44% female. Tumor grade was: 73% grade 1 (G1), 18%, grade 2 (G2) and 9% grade 3 (G3). Staging investigations were performed in 52% of patients. All serum chromogranin A and 97% of 24-hour urine 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid tests were normal. The large majority of staging computed tomography (CT) scans were negative (76%) with subgroup analysis showing no G1 patients with CT identified distant disease compared with 38% of G2 and 50% of G3 patients (p < 0.001). G1 patients were more likely to achieve R0/R1 resections compared to G2 (95% vs. 50%, p < 0.001) and G1 patients had significantly better 5-year overall survival (G1: 98%, G2: 67%, G3: 10%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Tumor grade is important in preoperative workup and surgical decision-making. Biochemical staging may be omitted but staging CT should be considered for patients with grade ≥ 2 lesions. Anatomic resections should be considered for patients with grade 2 disease.

Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis: Practical Insights for Clinicians.

This article aims to provide a guide that will help healthcare professionals and clinical researchers from all fields that deal with Kaplan-Meier curves. Survival analysis methods are among the most frequently used in the medical sciences and in clinical research. Overall survival, progression free survival, time to recurrence, or any other clinically relevant parameter represented by a Kaplan-Meier curve will be discussed. We will present a practical and straightforward interpretation of these curves, setting aside intricate mathematical considerations. Our focus will be on essential concepts that interface with biological sciences and medicine in order to guarantee proficiency in one of the most popular yet frequently misunderstood methods in clinical research. Being familiar with these concepts is not only essential for designing new clinical studies but also for critically assessing and interpreting published data.

Prognostic Values of CD8+, PARP, and EGFR on Overall Survival in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the associations of CD8+, PARP, and EGFR expressions with two-year survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a national cancer center. All patients aged 18 years diagnosed with TNBC (2013-2017) were included and followed for 24 months or until the patients were deceased. Kaplan-Meier survival function and Cox proportional hazard model were applied for the analyses. RESULTS: The study population was followed for 24 months (2,692 person-months, N = 126). At the end of the follow-up, 27 patients were deceased. The two-year mortality rate was 10 per 1,000 person-month. Kaplan-Meier graphs showed that after approximately one year of follow-up, poorer survival was seen in patients with low CD8+, positive PARP, and positive EGFR. The adjusted analysis found staging as the main predictor of overall survival in TNBC (HR = 7.20, 95% CI= 2.07 - 25.00). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low CD8+, positive PARP, and positive EGFR expressions seem to be associated with poorer overall survival in TNBC. After approximately one year of follow-up, higher survival was observed in patients with high CD8+, negative PARP, and negative EGFR. Staging remains the main predictor of TNBC survival. Therefore, early detection and treatment of TNBC are essential to improve survival.

Outcomes of the patients with metastatic male breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this research is to investigate the clinical characteristics and prognosis of men with metastatic breast cancer (mMBC). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the data of 28 patients was conducted. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to assess overall survival (OS) and prognostic variables. RESULTS: At the time of diagnosis, the median age was 57 years (range 26-86). The most prevalent pathological subtype was invasive ductal carcinoma (92.6%). HER2 positivity was 21.6% in patients, with estrogen and progesterone receptor positivity at 96.4% and 71.4%, respectively. Bone-75%, lung-39.3%, brain-21.4%, and adrenal gland-10.7% were the most prevalent metastatic sites. Trastuzumab-based chemotherapy was given to six patients. During the study period, 14 patients (or half) died. All patients had a median OS of 42.6 months (range: 21.6-63.7). The OS rates after 1, 3, and 5 years were 95.7%, 54.2%, and 36.6%, respectively. The number of metastatic locations (P = 0.045), brain metastasis (P = 0.033), and a history of regular alcohol intake (P = 0.008) were all shown to be statistically significant factors affecting OS in univariate analysis. However, multivariate analysis did not support the findings. In addition, we discovered that trastuzumab-based therapy and de-novo metastatic disease had no effect on OS for mMBC. CONCLUSIONS: The data on mMBC is restricted because of its rarity. The prognosis of mMBC was shown to be poor in this investigation. Despite the small number of patients, we discovered that in univariate analysis, having brain metastases, the number of metastatic locations, and a history of alcohol intake may be prognostic factors.

Clinicopathological outcomes of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer.

AIMS: This study aims to evaluate the histopathological features and prognostic parameters of tumors with microsatellite instability (MSI) compared with those without MSI in patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC). SETTING AND DESIGN: Follow-up for CRC at Istanbul Sultan 2. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital was retrospectively evaluated between March 2017 and March 2021. METHODS AND MATERIAL: The patients were divided into two groups: those with and without MSI. Groups were compared in survival parameters. As a secondary result, groups were compared in pathological parameters such as stage, tumor diameter, degree of differentiation, and lymphovascular, and perineural invasion. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Survival calculations were performed using the Kaplan-Meier analysis method. The effects of various prognostic factors related to tumor and patient characteristics on disease-free and overall survival (OS) were investigated by log-rank test. RESULTS: Two hundred fourteen patients were analyzed. The median age of the patients was 66 (30-89), and 59.3% (n = 127) were male. There were 25 patients in the MSI group and 189 patients in the non-MSI group. We found that MSI tumors had a significantly higher differentiation degree than non-MSI tumors and larger tumor diameters. MSI tumors frequently settled in the proximal colon, and more lymph nodes were removed in the resection material. MSI tumors had longer disease-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: By diagnosing microsatellite instability, CRCs can be divided into two groups. The histopathological features of the tumor and the prognosis of the disease differ between these groups. MSI can be a predictive marker in the patient's follow-up and treatment.

Prognostic microRNAs as biomarkers for prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Prostate cancer is the second largest cancer, most commonly diagnosed in men. Several studies reveal that miRNAs (microRNAs) are involved in various stages of prostate cancer. miRNAs are a family of small non-coding RNA species that have been implicated in the post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. The present in silico study aims at identifying miRNA biomarkers that are significantly associated with the regulation of genes involved in prostate cancer. METHODS: Dataset of miRNA and mRNA of prostate adenocarcinoma patients and controls was downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), and differential gene expression analysis was carried out. ROC and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed on differentially expressed miRNAs. Pathway analysis was carried out for significant miRNAs, and protein-protein interaction of involved genes and miRNAs was examined. RESULTS: A total of 185 miRNAs were differentially expressed between the patients and the control. ROC and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the two miRNAs hsa-mir-133b and hsa-mir-17-5p were found to be significantly associated with prostate cancer prognosis. HAS2 and EPHA10 gene targets of identified miRNA were also differentially expressed. A protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed, and the HAS2 gene was found to be interacting with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). CONCLUSION: This study highlights the potential of hsa-mir-133b and hsa-mir-17-5p miRNAs as biomarkers for the prognosis of prostate cancer. However, further experimental studies are required to validate this finding.

Prognostic analysis of sex and age in hepatocellular carcinoma: a SEER study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to explore the impact of sex on clinical features and survival among hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. METHODS: HCC case data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for the period 2010 to 2015 were selected for analysis. Kaplan-Meier curves displayed overall survival. Univariate cox regression examined the prognostic characteristics of individual features, and multivariate Cox regression assessed hazard ratios. RESULTS: This study comprised 3486 HCC patients, with 2682 males and 804 females. Across all age groups, there was a higher prevalence of males compared to females. Survival curves among female patients showed no significant differences across various age groups. However, among male patients, those under 60 demonstrated notably higher survival rates compared to those aged 60 and above. Regarding various ethnicities, TNM staging systems, tumor sizes, the presence of lung/bone/brain metastases, location in Purchased/Referred Care Delivery Areas, SEER historic stages, tumor grades, and individuals receiving chemotherapy, the proportion of male patients consistently exceeded that of female patients. Within the female patient group, individuals receiving chemotherapy exhibited significantly higher survival rates compared to those who did not. However, the administration of chemotherapy showed no significant impact on the survival rate of male patients. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed age, gender, and the administration of chemotherapy key factors influencing the overall survival prognosis. CONCLUSION: Age, gender, and the administration of chemotherapy are influential factors in the prognosis of both male and female HCC patients.

Identification of the prognostic value of LACTB2 and its correlation with immune infiltrates in ovarian cancer by integrated bioinformatics analyses.

Ovarian cancer (OC) is one of the most common reproductive tumors in women, whereas current treatment options are limited. ß-lactamase-like-protein 2 (LACTB2) has been observed to be associated with various cancers, but its function in OC is unknown. Therefore, we evaluate the prognostic value and the underlying function of LACTB2 in OC. In this study, high expression of LACTB2 was observed in OC compared with normal controls. Kaplan-Meier Plotter analysis revealed that overexpressed LACTB2 is strongly correlated with poor prognosis. We conducted GO/KEGG analysis to investigate the potential biological function of LACTB2 in OC. GESA analysis showed that LACTB2 was closely related to immune-related pathways. Subsequently, we explored the relationship between LACTB2 and 24 types of immune cells in OC. The results suggested that LACTB2 was positively associated with multiple tumor-infiltrating immune cells. Importantly, LACTB2 may modulate immune cell infiltration in OC to influence prognosis. In conclusion, LACTB2 can be used as a promising prognostic biomarker and immunotherapy target for OC.

Exploration of the prognostic prediction value of the PANoptosis-based risk score and its correlation with tumor immunity in lung adenocarcinoma.

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is a common cancer with high mortality worldwide. PANoptosis is a novel inflammatory programmed cell death modality with the characteristics of pyroptosis, apoptosis and necroptosis. It is necessary to explore PANoptosis-related genes in LUAD patients and offer evidence for prognosis prediction and therapeutic strategies. Single-cell RNA sequencing data and RNA expression profiles of LUAD patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus databases are used to screen PANoptosis-related differential genes for the construction of a risk model. Fifteen PANoptosis-related markers with prognostic value were identified by Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO)-Cox regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis further demonstrated the significant predictive capability. Immune infiltration, Single Nucleotide Variants (SNV) mutations, and clinical drug susceptibility were analyzed. In conclusion, a risk model of 15 PANoptosis-related genes has significant value in prognostic prediction for LUAD and has potential to direct clinical therapeutic strategies during the treatment.

Prognosis significance and potential association between ALDOA and AKT expression in colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignant tumors of the digestive tract and a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Since many CRC patients are diagnosed already in the advanced stage, and traditional chemoradiotherapy is prone to drug resistance, it is important to find new therapeutic targets. In this study, the expression levels of ALDOA and p-AKT were detected in cancer tissues and paired normal tissues, and it was found that they were significantly increased in CRC tissues, and their high expression indicated poor prognosis. Moreover, a positive correlation between the expression of ALDOA and p-AKT was found in CRC tissues and paired normal tissues. In addition, the Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the group with both negative of ALDOA/p-AKT expression had longer five-year survival rates compared with the other group. Besides, the group with both high expression of ALDOA/p-AKT had a worse prognosis compared with the other group. Based on the expression of ALDOA and p-AKT in tumor tissues, we can effectively distinguish tumor tissues from normal tissues through cluster analysis. Furthermore, we constructed nomograms to predict 3-year and 5-year overall survival, showing that the expression of ALDOA/p-AKT plays a crucial role in predicting the prognosis of CRC patients. Therefore, ALDOA/p-AKT may act as a crucial role in CRC, which may provide new horizons for targeted therapies for CRC.

Prognostic factors of pancreatic tumors in children and adolescents: a population study based on the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database.

PURPOSE: Pancreatic tumors in children are uncommon, and data is scarce. The purpose of this study is to examine the prognostic factors of pediatric pancreatic tumors in a population-based cohort. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify all pediatric patients with pancreatic tumors diagnosed between 1975 and 2018. The overall survival (OS) rates were determined using a Kaplan-Meier analysis. The log-rank test was used for univariate survival analysis. Cox proportional-hazards regression was used to determine the variables related to OS. RESULTS: We identified 195 children with pancreatic tumors, with a median age at diagnosis of 16 years. Tumors were classified as neuroendocrine tumors (33.8%), solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPTs) (32.3%), pancreatoblastoma (11.3%), and others (22.6%). Of the patients, 30.3% had distant metastases, and 69.7% had surgery. Pancreatoblastomas were more common in younger children, whereas solid pseudopapillary tumors were more common in female patients. Overall 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates for all patients were 90.3%, 79.2%, and 77.7%, respectively. The Cox proportional hazard regression revealed that SEER stage and surgery were significant independent predictors of overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic tumors are rare in children, and overall survival is grim except for SPTs. SEER stage and surgery were determined to be the most relevant determinants of OS in our study.

The impact of COVID-19 and other factors on the usage status of the biologic drug therapies for rheumatoid arthritis: A study from Vietnam / El impacto de COVID-19 y otros factores en el estado de uso de las terapias farmacológicas biológicas para la artritis reumatoide: un estudio de Vietnam

Objectives: To describe the status of using biological Disease Modifying Anti Rheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs) to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and related factors. In addition, the study determined the impact of COVID-19 on the usage of bDMARDs. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study and included 219 RA patients over 18 years old. The Kaplan–Meier method and the log-rank test (p<0.05) were used to estimate the retention time and compare between different times. Cox regression analysis was used to determine the factors affecting the retention time of biological drugs (p<0.05). Results: Out of 1967 courses of treatment, there were 149 (7.6%) drug discontinuations, 760 (38.6%) doses extensions and 64 (3.3%) drug switch. Moderate disease level and choosing tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors initially were associated with retention time of COVID-19. Drug discontinuations and dose extensions increased after COVID-19 emergence. The retention time during COVID-19 was significantly different from that of pre-COVID-19. Gender, type of first-used bDMARD, conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) and corticoid usage status, disease activity levels were associated with retention time. Conclusion: The presence of COVID-19 has a significant effect on usage status of the biologic drug. Further longitudinal studies are needed to clarify the relationship between COVID-19 and drug usage as well as related factors.(AU)

Objetivos: Describir el estado del uso de fármacos antirreumáticos modificadores de la enfermedad biológica (bDMARD) para tratar la artritis reumatoide (AR) y los factores relacionados. Además, el estudio determinó el impacto de COVID-19 en el uso de bDMARD. Métodos: Este es un estudio transversal que incluyó a 219 pacientes con AR mayores de 18 años. El método Kaplan-Meier y la prueba Log-rank (p<0,05) se usaron para estimar el tiempo de retención y compararlo entre diferentes tiempos. El análisis de regresión de Cox se utilizó para determinar los factores que afectan el tiempo de retención de los medicamentos biológicos (p<0,05). Resultados: De 1.967 cursos de tratamiento, hubo 149 (7,6%) interrupciones del fármaco, 760 (38,6%) extensiones de dosis y 64 (3,3%) cambios de fármaco. Nivel de enfermedad moderado y elección del factor de necrosis tumoral (TNF) inhibidores inicialmente se asociaron con el tiempo de retención de COVID-19. Las discontinuaciones de los medicamentos y las extensiones de las dosis aumentaron después de la aparición de COVID-19. El tiempo de retención durante COVID-19 fue significativamente diferente del pre-COVID-19. Género, tipo de bDMARD de primer uso, convencional DMARD sintéticos (csDMARDs) y el estado de uso de corticoides, los niveles de actividad de la enfermedad se asociaron con el tiempo de retención. Conclusión: La presencia de COVID-19 tiene un efecto significativo en el estado de uso del medicamento biológico. Se necesitan más estudios longitudinales para aclarar la relación entre COVID-19 y el uso de fármacos, así como los factores relacionados.(AU)

Identifying the Best Candidate for Primary Tumor Resection in Patients With Advanced Osteosarcoma.

OBJECTIVES: Not all patients with stage III and IV osteosarcoma who undergo surgery to remove the primary tumor will benefit from surgery; therefore, we developed a nomogram model to test the hypothesis that only a subset of patients will benefit from surgery. METHODS: 412 patients were screened from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Subsequently, 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to screen and balance confounders. We first made the hypothesis that patients who underwent the procedure would benefit more. A multivariate Cox model was used to explore the independent influencing factors of CSS in two groups (benefit group and non-benefit group) and constructed nomograms with predicted prognosis. Finally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to verify the performance of the nomogram. RESULTS: Of these patients, approximately 110 did not undergo primary tumour resection. After passing PSM, they were divided into a surgical group and a non-surgical group. Age, primary site and chemotherapy as calculated independent factors were used to construct a nomogra. The predicted nomogram showed good consistency in terms of the ROC curve and the calibration curve, and the DCA curve showed a certain clinical utility. Finally, dividing the surgical patients into surgical beneficiaries and surgical non-beneficiaries, a Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the nomogram can identify patients with osteosarcoma who can benefit from surgery. CONCLUSION: A practical predictive model was established to determine whether patients with stage III or IV osteosarcoma would benefit from surgery.

Wedge Resection versus Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Tumors ≤8 mm.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the overall survival of patients with ≤8 mm non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who undergo wedge resection versus stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Kaplan-Meier analysis, multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling, and propensity score-matched analysis were performed to evaluate the overall survival of patients with ≤8 mm NSCLC in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2017 who underwent wedge resection versus patients who underwent SBRT. The above-mentioned matched analyses were repeated for patients with no comorbidities. Patients who were coded in the NCDB as having undergone radiation because surgery was contraindicated due to patient risk factors (e.g., comorbid conditions, advance age, etc.) and those with a history of prior malignancy were excluded from analysis. Of the 1505 patients who had NSCLC ≤8 mm during the study period, 1339 (89%) patients underwent wedge resection, and 166 (11%) patients underwent SBRT. In the unadjusted analysis, multivariable Cox modeling and propensity score-matched analysis, wedge resection was associated with improved survival when compared to SBRT. These results were consistent in a sensitivity analysis limited to patients with no comorbidities.

Clinically relevant gene signatures provide independent prognostic information in older breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The clinical utility of gene signatures in older breast cancer patients remains unclear. We aimed to determine signature prognostic capacity in this patient subgroup. METHODS: Research versions of the genomic grade index (GGI), 70-gene, recurrence score (RS), cell cycle score (CCS), PAM50 risk-of-recurrence proliferation (ROR-P), and PAM50 signatures were applied to 39 breast cancer datasets (N = 9583). After filtering on age ≥ 70 years, and the presence of estrogen receptor (ER) and survival data, 871 patients remained. Signature prognostic capacity was tested in all (n = 871), ER-positive/lymph node-positive (ER + /LN + , n = 335) and ER-positive/lymph node-negative (ER + /LN-, n = 374) patients using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox-proportional hazard (PH) modelling. RESULTS: All signatures were statistically significant in Kaplan-Meier analysis of all patients (Log-rank P < 0.001). This significance remained in multivariable analysis (Cox-PH, P ≤ 0.05). In ER + /LN + patients all signatures except PAM50 were significant in Kaplan-Meier analysis (Log-rank P ≤ 0.05) and remained so in multivariable analysis (Cox-PH, P ≤ 0.05). In ER + /LN- patients all except RS were significant in Kaplan-Meier analysis (Log-rank P ≤ 0.05) but only the 70-gene, CCS, ROR-P, and PAM50 signatures remained so in multivariable analysis (Cox-PH, P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We found that gene signatures provide prognostic information in survival analyses of all, ER + /LN + and ER + /LN- older (≥ 70 years) breast cancer patients, suggesting a potential role in aiding treatment decisions in older patients.

Survival does not differ by annual center transplant volume-A Pediatric Heart Transplant Society Registry study.

BACKGROUND: There are conflicting data regarding the relationship between center volume and outcomes in pediatric heart transplantation. Previous studies have not fully accounted for differences in case mix, particularly in high-risk congenital heart disease (CHD) groups. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between center volume and outcomes using the Pediatric Heart Transplant Society (PHTS) Registry and explore how case mix may affect outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all pediatric patients in the PHTS Registry who received a heart transplant from 2009 to 2018 was performed. Centers were divided into 5 groups based on average yearly transplant volume. The primary outcome was time to death or graft loss and outcomes were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: There were 4583 cases among 55 centers included. There was no difference in time to death or graft loss by center volume in the entire cohort (p = .75), in patients with CHD (p = .79) or in patients with cardiomyopathy (p = .23). There was also no difference in time to death or graft loss by center size in patients undergoing transplant after Norwood, Glenn or Fontan (log rank p = .17, p = .31, and p = .10 respectively). There was a statistically significant difference in outcomes by center size in the positive crossmatch group (p < .0001), though no discernible pattern related to high or low center volume. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes are similar among transplant centers of all sizes, including for high-risk patient groups with CHD. Future work is needed to understand how patient-specific risk factors may vary among centers of various sizes and whether this influences patient outcomes.